Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) |
Author: ptheland 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: Sane-Washing Trump Incoherence
Date: 09/10/24 4:49 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
That she is not a convict felon, nor an adjudicated rapist, nor suffering dementia, and is not incredibly stupid does not shed any light on if she has any idea at all about how to solve many of the problems facing our country.

Well, listening to the convicted felon, adjudicated rapist, demented, and stupid candidate doesn't give me the impression that he has any idea at all about anything, let alone complex problems. He makes sure we know he's clueless every time he opens his mouth.

Question posed: How would you deal with child care?
Answer: several minute ramble that makes absolutely no sense at all, but did include the words "child care" a couple of times, along with the word "numbers".

The only topic on which he seems to be able to compose a coherent sentence is the 2020 election, which he often claims was stolen from him.

Which brings up another topic. You have asked multiple times, Michael, for your opponents to talk about Harris' position on a variety of topics. And you get answers. How about you address your candidate's position on a topic that many consider important? Here's a couple I'd like to know more about. Pick any one you'd like.

-His criminal conviction in New York, specifically why that conviction isn't disqualifying for a presidential candidate.
-Or his other open criminal cases, Georgia, DC federal court, FL federal court. Why aren't those disqualifying?
-How about his position on the 2020 election. He has claimed on a great many occasions that the election was stolen from him. Yet he cannot provide any evidence of that which has stood up to scrutiny in court? Why does he persist in his claims despite the lack of evidence?

--Peter
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to ptheland here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community