Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (118) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 88922 
Subject: Re: war with Denmark or Panama??
Date: 01/08/25 3:31 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
Why does the concept of self interest stick in the craw of progressives.

It doesn't. That's the point. As you note, every country always follows policies with its own interests in mind, and always recognizes the possibility that pursuing and expanding international relationships might be the best course in those contexts.

But America has always done this. Democrats always did this. Democrats have often regarded pursuing and expanding international relationships as a very important part of pursuing our national interests, to be sure - but that's why they pursued various foreign policy objectives. Presumably, the doctrine of "America First" has meaning. It can't simply mean that America has interests - no person on earth has ever argued otherwise. If it means anything, it must mean that American interests have to be prioritized above the interests of other countries in a way that is different than we historically have done.

So if we're advocating that type of reorientation, why would Greenland do anything different? Why wouldn't they follow "Greenland First" - and if their national interests don't involve taking our security interests into account, they wouldn't (and presumably shouldn't) do so?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (118) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy