Post #42395 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

This is why most of us don't bother discussing things with you any longer. You consistently misrepresent what others say to you. Then you persist is claiming you are right in your interpretation even after is it explained to you why you are wrong.

Fail.

Regardless, it doesn't matter whether you agree with my position on that law or not - under your interpretation of the law, it would be a crime not just for Waltz and Hegseth to send classified or national security information on Signal, but for Rubio and Wiles and everyone else to receive it.

That's al upthread attempting to use my arguments against me. He's the one saying "it would be a crime"...and that includes the reporter.

Try again. Or show me your belly again. You pick.

So I'm not going to discuss this with you

Oh noes! You're merely lib #235 who would rather make this about me than about the issues.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.