Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: OrmontUS   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: President's Day Opinion Piece
Date: 02/17/26 6:35 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
I agree with the article (and the OP'er) 100%. Unfortunately, regardless of party, we seem to have the best Congress (and executive department - and maybe Supreme Court) that money can buy. Members of both houses of Congress, and both parties, have to continue to be reelected to do the "Work of the Lord".

This requires piles of money to fund their campaigns. Those who provide the funds, in quantity, can expect that representative to give them access and to act sympathetically to addressing their interests. We dignify this form of bribery/graft by calling it lobbying. While politicians tie themselves in knots to rationalize this practice and pretend that they are not corrupt, their actions speak louder than their words. Similarly, they are subject to the extortion of their own party leaders to follow the party line or face political challenges.

That said, the executive branch is currently displaying that everything is for sale "at a price" and it seems ambiguous (or not) if the renumeration is on behalf of the US treasury.

And, it also appears that the fox is in charge of the henhouse when it comes to the Supreme Court, where those who are tasked with remembering vast amounts of legal information seem forgetful when it comes to reporting things of value they have received from some who have interest in their rulings.

When it comes to politicians, as a class, don't expect a hail storm when you asked those who are without sin to cast the first stone (and don't expect them to stand up for your rights if it hurts their chance of being reelected).

Jeff
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to OrmontUS here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community