Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |
Author: Steve203 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Contracts
Date: 05/12/26 1:10 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
We discussed the Trump phone scam a few days ago.

Trump Mobile quietly rewrote its fine print to say the gold Trump phone may never be made, a year after taking $100 deposits

A year after followers of President Donald Trump put down $100 deposits for a Trump-branded gold phone, not one has shipped, and a recent change in the fine print has some worried they may never arrive.

Last month, the company behind Trump Mobile, T1 Mobile LLC, quietly updated its preorder terms and conditions to clarify that it “does not guarantee that a Device will be produced or made available for purchase.”


msn.com - Trump mobile quietly rewrote its fine to say the gold trump phone may never be made a year after taking deposi

It's been a long time since I took contract law in b-school, but, sticks in my mind, when a person accepts an offer, with certain stated terms and conditions, and provides "consideration", ie a cash deposit, it is a contract. One party can't come back a year later and change the conditions at it's whim.

Of course, the cynics will say that a $100 deposit is not worth the legal costs of suing.

Not surprisingly, I have been waiting for the day we see "JC" oriented "contract reform", where contracts are only binding on Proles, but not "JCs", in "JC"/Prole contracts, because honoring the contract would be a "burden" on the "JCs".

Steve
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Steve203 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community