No. of Recommendations: 2
As a result, the case will not be tried before the November election...
Why is that a given? The NYT article - which I can't read in full - said this:
The justices scheduled arguments for the week of April 22 and said proceedings in the trial court would remain frozen while they considered the matter.
So, couldn't they hear arguments week of April 22 and still render a decision, say, by the end of May (optimistically)? Does that simply not allow enough time, given three months will have been lost?
- John
