Post #14967 by sano on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (15)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 5

"States, however, would be perfectly free to ban them if they felt the downside to their populace was not worth the benefit to their militia's readiness."

What's the point?

If the point of laws is to address major problems (can we agree that the ubiquity of high capacity/rapid fire weapons in our nation is a big problem?),
then 50 different rules render all rules useless since a person can easily fill his trunk with machine guns purchased just over the border of an adjacent state.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (15)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.