Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49) |
Author: Lapsody   😊 😞
Number: of 84357 
Subject: Re: Appaling
Date: 01/27/24 10:49 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
BHM:Surely you realize I distust him when he says this since there nothing to actually force him to and once Ukraine has their money, it is back to business as usual. If Biden had any real passion for border security, he could have fixed it back in 21/22 when he had both houses of congress.

"The Republican Party retained their majority in both the House and the Senate, and, with inauguration of Donald Trump on January 20, 2017, attained an overall federal government trifecta for the first time since the 109th Congress in 2005."

So did Trumpolina. Let me reemphasize Albabys point that the significant blocks on both sides that want to pass immigration reform get torpedoed by those who like the status quo, because it's and easy vote getter issue. Right now that's Trump. It's not a "both sides" issue, the people who like the issue are normally Republicans. I remember De Santis bemoaning the fact that Abbott had a border with Mexico and he didn't.

So Abbott gets to grand stand in stand off against the Feds and string barb wire as if that makes a difference, but it's a good show for Q and all those whose main personality if a distrust of the government. Historically that's fine to an extent as the Midwest to the West, and the South always distrusted the Fed, but why they trust the state beats me. Historical stats show that state governments are far more corrupt than the Fed. So State govs get in on it just by talking about sending the National Guard. So it isn't like y'all are seen as beacons of trustworthiness, more like the corrupt, immoral, conspiracy loving RW nutjobs we have to deal with.

Biden can, if he wants to activate the National Guard, but he's reserved and not rash in his moves. I like that.

So it looks like we are doomed to have the RW grandstanding about a border they have a chance to fix, but for the nth time aren't and this time because Trumpolina wants to grandstand on the border issue.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Lapsody here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community