Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (37) |
Author: jerryab   😊 😞
Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: The Constitution is Unconstitutional!
Date: 08/25/26 12:21 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
Postmaster General David Steiner told a Senate committee that, if adopted, the rule would have USPS withhold mail ballots from states that don’t hand over to the federal government lists of people who requested absentee or mail ballots.

Therein lies the fun part.

When the states mail the ballots, they HAVE handed over the list of people who requested absentee ballots. ALL OF THEM (meaning *both* ALL the states *and* ALL the ballots). Oh, the federal govt FAILED TO BE PREPARED? Not the states' problem.

KEY POINT: The states do NOT know who will RECEIVE an absentee ballot until such a request is actually made AND THE ABSENTEE BALLOT IS SENT (because the state has to do its verification/documentation/etc BEFORE sending an absentee ballot). Thus, it is UNABLE to provide a complete list of ALL voters (absentee or in-person) because that list continuously changes--and it always changes, up to--AND INCLUDING--election day. This was publicly documented by O'Keefe in MN in the primary elections held in August 2026. His MULTIPL ATTEMPTED ELECTION FRAUD CRIMES--and criminal impersonations--were caught and identified as he to commit those impersonation crimes AND vote crimes. In MN, it is a CRIME to impersonate a voter at a voting place. He chose to post the videos of himself (and another person) committing those crimes, so no claim of Fifth Amendment protection exists.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to jerryab here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (37) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community