Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |
Author: PhoolishPhilip   😊 😞
Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: Clintonites lost bigly
Date: 06/10/26 4:43 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
“the rise of populism as a powerful faction within the Democratic party has come at tremendous expense to the factions that were centered around those issues… - who have definitely lost some of their power within the party, but not nearly as much as the Greens and the minority rights coalitions.”

Let’s talk black politics, since you keep hinting at it. The elderly civil rights coalition succeeded in creating openings for educated and monied black people but has done little for the vast majority of working class black people, especially less well educated black men. Indeed this civil rights elite is often aligned with the white elite in moralizing the problems experienced in poor black communities. This is why younger black voters are getting behind progressive candidates, AND WHY MANY OF THOSE CANDIDATES ARE PEOPLE OF COLOR.

Your mistake is insisting that these issues of civil rights and environmental justice are separate from the dynamic of class inequality and wealth concentration. They are not.

While you can address the opportunity structure for some minorities through policies aimed at racial equality, you’ll never achieve for all unless you attack the class inequality at the root of racial privilege.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to PhoolishPhilip here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community