Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (62) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: Those Trump Class "Battleships"
Date: 12/23/25 12:55 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
No, they won't be cutting-edge or the most lethal surface warfare ships. Because they're battleships, and battleships are obsolete technology.

That's what I (and pretty much everyone else with any knowledge about naval power) has been saying. Also, we haven't built a battleship since the 1940s, not 1994 (I'm assuming the Felon made that claim? He's wrong again.). In fact, the Mighty Mo was the last battleship we ever built, and that was 1944.

Hopefully someone in the Navy (not Hegseth, obviously, but someone lower down who knows something about something) can put enough sand in the gears of this so that too much money isn't wasted before we have a new President that might actually learn something about what the Navy needs....

Naval procurement is its own mess, but I'm pretty sure POTUS can't just dictate what gets built. For one, Congress has to approve the funding, which will be part of a larger defense bill (usually). And the Navy has a set of requirement for their ships which have to be met (and, sometimes, creates problems as it did with the FREMM/Constellation).

I think all that has to occur is Congress saying "no", which is likely if the Navy says they don't want it. Which they don't. Of course, I suppose the Felon could fire all Navy personnel until he finds one that agrees with him.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (62) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community