Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (92) |
Author: RaplhCramden 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 21944 
Subject: Re: Make Berkshire Compound Again!
Date: 06/09/26 9:53 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Mark:
But it isn't - it's the VCs selling, the round B, C, D, E, etc investors selling, it's employees selling, and it's management also selling. Nearly everyone is selling some at the IPO, and only public shareholders (individually and via myriad funds) who are buying. All those other investors are EXITING, or at least partially exiting, at the IPO. It wasn't always like that.

And it also didn't used to be that the connecting rods were made in one factory, the fuel-injectors in another, and the chips that controlled it all were made in yet another factory. But the "excelsior," the "onward and upward" of our technical economy are a story of unrelenting specialization, standardization, and mass-production until the most exquisite expression of technology is no longer a graphite pencil.

Without the exit of going public there would be, essentially, no venture capitalists, no firms that specialized in just how you got companies from a market cap of $10,000 up into the millions. If every time you had someone who figured out how to do this, they had to, for obscure moral or aesthetic reasons that are hard to justify with math or physics, hold that investment for the next 20 years to prove their moral worth and depth of character, we would have no steady stream of new start-ups.

Y-combinator isn't a bug, it is a feature.

R:
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to RaplhCramden here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (92) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community