Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84351 
Subject: Re: I changed my mind
Date: 03/14/25 7:32 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
The word "causing" is doing an awful lot of work in that sentence. Dems didn't "cause" any of this.

They would have "caused" a shutdown if they voted against the CR.

Democrats have no control in the House. They are the minority party. The majority party can pass any bill it wants, and the minority cannot stop them.

The Democrats do have some measure of control in the Senate. The Senate rules allow the minority party to stop virtually all legislation, other than reconciliation bills (or if the majority has a supermajority). The Democrats do have some power in that chamber.

With power, comes responsibility for how you exercise that power. The Democrats in the House could freely vote against the CR without much responsibility for what happens if it fails, because they have very little power - and therefore virtually no responsibility - in that chamber. But that's not true of the Senate. There, the Democrats would have had primary responsibility for a shutdown - because they have the power to force that outcome, and it would happen because of their choices.

There was a play to stop the CR - hold the line in the House and hope that the internal tensions in the GOP prevented them from getting to 216. The GOP would have borne the primary responsibility for the bill failing in the first place. But once that failed, the Democrats no longer had an option where the CR could falter and the resulting shutdown would not be due to their choice.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community