Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 48466 
Subject: Re: Line of Succession Question
Date: 12/20/2024 1:22 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Sure. But it looks goofy. Which is the point.

To whom? To rocket nerds - the audience he was gunning for - it was 100% engineering badassery. It also generated worldwide interest into a test launch and got millions of views - 2.3 million to be exact, making it the 2nd most watched launch even in history.

If your government takes climate change seriously, and a non-trivial contributor to climate change is livestock emissions, then it's not a waste to go out and conduct research on the scale and degree of livestock emissions. But if you are paying taxpayer dollars to measure cow farts, people will call it pork and nonsense.

Maybe because cow fart studies *are* bogus. Do you really want to solve "global warming"? If the answer is yes then cows are miles down the list.

Care to guess where you'd start? If someone was really serious about it? You'd ground air travel worldwide for 2 days a week.

You might say, "But that's crazy. You'd paralyze a lot of the world economy as well as make movement about the global restricted!". But how cray-cray is that compared with significantly altering the fundamental protein intake of billions of people?

Food for thought.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds