Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) |
Author: onepoorguy ⎊✺  😊 😞
Number: of 88930 
Subject: Re: Sane-Washing Trump Incoherence
Date: 09/10/24 9:06 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
That many standard Democratic positions (pro-choice, pro-trans rights, gun control) are morally indefensible to them, even if they are morally indefensible in a different way than Manson's murders are.

But that is incoherent. You (or, more specifically, the people you are referring to) are comparing actual crimes to policy positions. Mike and I can debate policy positions all day. We could spend an evening over dinner and not agree on anything, and probably get along just fine. I don't view him as a monster, and I hope he doesn't view me that way either. It's just policies. Neither of us (to my knowledge) has committed any crimes worse than perhaps a speeding ticket. Manson was a monster**. The convict is a monster of a different sort (i.e. I'm not aware that he has orchestrated multiple murders); being guilty of rape and up to 34 felonies (I'll grant that he may prevail on the appeal of some subset of those felonies, but probably not all of them). Rape is pretty monstrous, IMHO. More felony convictions are pending.

There are positions, and there are actions. I red-line actions (like...oh...rape). I won't refuse to meet up with Mike if he were to come to Phoenix just because we don't agree on a universal minimum basic income. I would refuse to meet the convict, even if he offered to pay.

Plus, Mike just said he wouldn't vote for Manson (were he alive) even if he agreed with all of Mike's positions. So there are red-lines present for Mike, also.

If neither candidate has crossed a red line, then I start looking at policy positions. But some things are disqualifying for me as a human person, nevermind policy or politics. IMO, a vote for a rapist and convicted felon is pretty much indefensible, no matter which party they claim to be. I said before, I wouldn't vote for Menendez, either, and he's a Dem (and didn't rape anyone, or at least hasn't been accused of that).




**Though it is interesting to note that he didn't actually kill anyone. He directed his followers to do it, and I believe was present only at one of the murder scenes (the La Biancas, as I recall, because the Tate murders were too messy for his liking).
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy