Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (43) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: Golden Dome - Canada?
Date: 01/24/26 8:58 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 13
There’s zero universe where China is a more reliable trading partner.

What on earth are you talking about? China's not the one bouncing their tariffs back and forth like a yo-yo. China's not the one abrogating existing free trade agreements every time the head of state gets annoyed with some unrelated aspect of other nation's conduct. China's not the one trying to completely upend the established rules of international trade.

You know, I read these statements and people forget about all the quotas and levies slapped on US goods that made it tough for us to compete for a long time…

And we had some, too. Canada's got quotas and tariff quotas on certain ag products (like eggs and milk), and we've got some on certain Canadian products (like lumber and steel). But for the most part, trade with Canada was largely unrestricted under NAFTA - until Trump decided to just ignore our prior commitments. That we agreed to.

I don't really understand what you're thinking, here. Was the idea that the U.S. would unilaterally reset all the terms of trade that have been in place for decades....and no one would react? That no one would take measures to respond to a previously stable set of trade practices becoming subject to whatever the President decided on any given day they should be?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (43) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community