Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20) |
Author: DTB   😊 😞
Number: of 21944 
Subject: Re: RationalWalk on BRK Valuation
Date: 03/04/25 10:08 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 13
Going forward I think there is a different scenario than what is constantly being mentioned here. What if the price of BRK, with a decent amount of volatility, slowly but surely works its way up to 1.75-2.0 BV and stays in that range? In time the earnings will easily support it. Those waiting for the magical 1.4X BV to reappear may need a black swan event which is always possible.


One of the black swan events is just a moderate to major market correction, say 30% off current stock prices, which would very likely bring Berkshire down from a market cap of $1.1t to, say, $800b. With $300b in cash available, he could set up a Dutch auction and buy back close to 40% of shares, solving the problem of the anchor that the cash represents, and returning Berkshire to a $500b market cap where there are more acquisition targets of the appropriate size. Then he could massively increase the repurchases going forward, in an attempt to shrink and not expand the size of the company.

In retrospect, it is a shame he didn't do this 15 years ago, when prices were much lower, and as you say, the repurchases have always been done with some reluctance. This has gone from the intial complete refusal to repurchase ("it would be taking advantage of outgoing shareholders") to a grudging acceptance that it made sense, but only at very low multiples to book (initial 1.1x, then 1.2x, and now more like 1.4-1.5x book. Maybe Buffett will be like Moses, condemned to never enter the land of milk and honey, and it will be his successor who keeps the basic insurance conglomerate model but fixes the size problem.

dtb
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to DTB here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community