Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |
Author: OrmontUS   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: What constitutes an existential threat to Russia_Q
Date: 08/22/25 10:58 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
While Russia has "explained" that Ukraine \, as a country, doesn't really exist and, besides, its president is illegitimate.

In the meantime, they have (with the alleged approval of their citizens by "vote") annexed the following oblasts of Ukraine:

Donetsk Oblast: Russia claims the entire region but controls only about 75% of it as of August 2025.
Kherson Oblast: Russia declared its annexation of the entire province. Following a Ukrainian counteroffensive in late 2022, Russia was forced to retreat from the city of Kherson and other areas on the west bank of the Dnipro River. As of late 2024, it controls roughly 76% of the oblast.
Luhansk Oblast: Russia claims the entirety of this region in eastern Ukraine. By mid-2025, Russian forces claimed to have taken full control.
Zaporizhzhia Oblast: Russia claims this southern province despite only controlling about 73–74% of it as of late 2024. The regional capital, Zaporizhzhia, remains under Ukrainian control.
Crimean Peninsula: Russia: Region annexed in 2014

The West has been fine to let the Russians expend arms, treasure and people in the meatgrinder of the Ukrainian line of contact. They have burned through a major portion of their mothballed Soviet armor vehicle and their economy is being pummeled, not only by sanctions, but by shifting to a wartime manufacturing economy.

The Russians have made it clear that nuclear weapons won't be used unless there is an existential threat to Russian territory.

We are getting to the point when there seems to be a possibility of countries who are members of NATO moving military assets into Ukraine to guaranty whatever an upcoming peace might look like. In that position it is natural to assume that there will be an aggressive border. It is to the West's advantage to continue to grind down the Russian military but at what point will crossing the border into what is now Russian-occupied oblasts of Ukraine deemed an invasion of Russia?

Frankly, so far, there is no benefit to Russia signing a cease fire as they have the resources to continue bleeding Ukraine - and the West does not currently have the ability to ship ammunition (of all sorts) at thee speed that Russia - supported by its allies - can. I imagine that the reason that North Korean soldiers were apparently only used on the Russian side of the border (in Kurtz) was to avoid setting a precedent of foreign troop formations crossing the borders.

This war is far from ending. President Trump apparently has two goals:

1) End the war quickly so he can clinch his Nobel Peace Prize (something such despicable people as Barak Obama and Greta Thunberg "stole from him")

2) Not do anything to upset Putin (whether because Putin "has the photos" or out of close friendship with the Russian leader, or because his family has been offered lucrative business opportunities)

In my opinion, the EU leaders rushed to support Zelensky in Washington to forestall his being forced to accept defeat to achieve Trump's goals. Figuring that Putin will diddle along and not meet with Zelenski and not sign a cease fire, I expect that, in a couple of weeks (the third or fourth "couple of weeks" Trump has outlined), rather than apply additional tariffs (well there aren’t any, so I guess it wouldn't be "additional") or sanctions on Russia, he will blame Zelensky for not signing the Russian offer and say that he can't do anything and the two sides should just duke it out without the US being involved.

At some point, in order to punish Russia enough to force them to call aa halt, Ukraine has to manufacture (and pay for) enough long-distance drones to match the Russian's 100+ a day.

Jeff
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to OrmontUS here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community