No. of Recommendations: 4
Once more, Executive Orders cannot create obligations for anyone that isn't part of the federal government. An EO is a directive or rule for the government, not a law that other people have to follow.
But it's not what he wants to happen.
Though...hmmmm...[type type type]...Roosevelt used EO 9066 to order Japanese internment. Though, it was directed at the military. So, while it affected private citizens, it wasn't directed at them. That would be the distinction, yes?
But an EO directing me to go back to work (just for a silly example), I could tell the Felon to take a long walk off a short pier, because it would be directed at me (private citizen). (Plus, I'd enjoy telling him off.)
