Post #68345 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

When reading posts, there are yellow stars against the names of the most respected Shrewds. The number of points in the star, starting at 3, represents the Shrewd'm-Star rating. This number is the average recommendation that the author received over the last 12 months.

- Manlobbi

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (52)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

Just as I thought.
You can't see the difference between a President deciding that a specific individual should be prosecuted versus presidents deciding that certain broad positions were what they wanted to prioritize

As if we just didn’t see the entire democrat party collude from the federal level to the state to get 1 guy: Trump.

And not 1mm’s worth of acknowledging anything I cited.

Normally I let you do that because I prefer to debate somewhat handicapped as it’s more challenging that way.

there's no "going back to normal again."

Indeed. You’re making the tacit admission here that we will never again have a democrat who will insist on non partisanship in the DOJ.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (52)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.