No. of Recommendations: 2
Seems like overturning or revising Chevron somehow is a good thing. It moves the needle towards congress making laws with more specificity and precision rather the passing high level goals and leaving it to the unaccountable deep state bureaucrats to flesh out.
Again, I think this also conflates the anti-delegation doctrine cases with the Chevron issue.
Overturning Chevron doesn't require Congress to provide more specificity or precision in their statutes. They're perfectly free to continue passing high level goals and allowing the agencies to flesh out the details, no matter what happens with Chevron. It would simply mean that when a statute is vague, the agency's read of the statute doesn't get any deference in a dispute.
