Dope1,

The clown fool ProGlib you are responding to apparently does not actually read his A.I. search results, which invariably include broad disclaimers that any generative A.I. search result may be wrong and should be independently verified for accuracy.

All this clown fool ProGlib does (and the many others who are similar) is frame his queries so as to try to generate responses that he can vomit onto message boards.

"Please provide me with arguments in favor of the proposition that Orange Man Bad."

The reason that some experts fear that, while a valuable tool, misuse of A.I. can cause a lot of damage, is precisely because of clown fool ProGlibs such as the one you are responding to.

No. You are a pretender. Everyone here is as smart or smarter than you, and are well aware of potential pitfalls. What you are saying is that this fellow doesn't know how to tie shoes. Fairly basic. I can tell you I ran into one answer that was horribly wrong and researching why gave me a chuckle. The bad sources were conservative and were just lying to their readers. That's why I really appreciated people like George Conway, an old type of conservative.

I'm sorry but AI makes you closer to being obsolete. All I need to do is copy part of what you say and stick one word in front of ti, like "Does" and a ? at the end. Easy peasy. But now it asks back - Is this marco or Dope? It learns!

You could get a job in Russia spreading propaganda to the masses though. Are you retired or still working?