Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |
Author: Goofyhoofy 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: Neither rain nor snow - but no cash
Date: 03/19/26 7:34 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
Several House Republicans who played a critical role in passing the Postal Service Reform Act said they were skeptical of providing further assistance to USPS.

And with Amazon about to cut back dramatically on their “last mile” contract, which is said to be worth $6 billion in revenue…

It’s always been contentious, but the only options are more revenue (higher prices) or lower costs (close offices, reduce hours, slow down service) or some combination thereof. But everybody wants lower cost at some other post office, not their own, and Congresscritters always object when the cuts are in their districts.

You can’t raise junk mail prices too much or that trade will go to other media. You can’t raise premium rates for overnight, etc or it will go to private carriers. Raising 1st class rates and similar won‘t really get you there, and there will be lots of vocal “ouch”.

My idea is to reduce service: Business on Monday-Wednesday-Friday, Residential on Tuesday-Thursday-Saturday. You get to whack half the delivery costs: drivers, gas, vehicles, etc. That would also engender a lot of switching I suppose, but the cost savings would be huge. Could higher cost private carriers take share from such a low cost service? Dunno. Just a thought.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Goofyhoofy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community