Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (63) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Democrat Surrender Monkeys
Date: 11/12/25 5:45 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Now I think I get it.

The Democrat Party must have done polling before the shut down and interpreted their polling results as projecting that the blame would be placed on the Republican party for the shut down, and therefore, the Republican party would give the Democrats whatever they wanted.

Maybe yes, maybe no. It's one thing to poll the general public, it's another thing entirely to have polled those people most directly and immediately affected by the shut down.

Sure, all the privileged white ProGlibs that got included in the shut down polling were probably vehemently anti-Trump and anti-GOP--as these folks always are. But that's not the same exact group as people directly and negatively affected by the shut down.

But the main problem with the Democrat strategy is: It was entirely unprincipled. "Give us what we want or we will make the American people suffer." Not a good look, ever. Hakeem Jeffries is STILL saying his caucus should vote against re-opening the government. Extending Covid era ACA subsidies when the Covid era is over with makes no sense. It doesn't address rising health care costs at all--it enables them. Just like the whole student loan fiasco. If the government keeps subsidizing endless money for something it will tend to get more expensive without limit. The Democrats never ever ever presented any valid policy arguments as to why Covid era enhanced ACA subsidies MUST be extended, without even a debate, or they would keep the government in shut down mode.

But I guess their polls were showing them that they could blame Republicans. As Angus King said, they didn't believe the Republicans would stick to their guns until several weeks passed. What Angus didn't explain is WHY the Democrats seemed to believe that the Republicans wouldn't stick to their guns. He didn't explain it because any explanation would not revolve around Republican thinking (i.e. it's a matter of principle), but around Democrat delusion of what they WISHED Republicans would be thinking--but assuming that Republicans were as totally lacking in principles as the Democrats seem to be.

That's why Angus King didn't explain why. The explanation makes the Democrats look like imbeciles.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to marco100 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (63) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community