No. of Recommendations: 2
Exactly, Adrian C.
None of the three cases highlighted in the NY Times article were present in the United States in accordance with immigration law. None of them had valid visas.
The NY Times, and the poor widdle illegals, were all well aware of that.
That's why the NY Times failed to publish any FACTS such as: What were the dates on their visas? Did they even have visas? If they had visas at one time but those visas expired or lapsed, how long were they in the country illegally?
What were the names of their lawyers who supposedly told them "not to worry about it"?
One of the three did admit to having entered or remained in the country illegally. The other two, nothing.
"FEEL SORRY FOR US. IGNORE THE FACT THAT WE VIOLATED IMMIGRATION LAW."
"WE DID WHAT WE WERE TOLD." (By who?) "WE FOLLOWED THE LAW." Really?
Nope, just a bunch of lies.
