No. of Recommendations: 3
I’m totally in favor of having his likeness on the $250, but only if he complies with the 1866 law in full.
That's what I had in mind when I posted this, but my subject line seems to have been a little too cryptic. I was tongue-in-cheek implying that the Treasury was planning his death, not planning for his death.
As a side note, it occurs to me that a very high percentage of his voters live paycheck to paycheck, and thus would likely never have the "honor" of sporting his $250 image in their wallet (without going into hock for it).
Something for his eventual tombstone: "Here lies the morally bankrupt, spreading financial bankruptcy even after death."
