Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84353 
Subject: Re: 2 more Chinese bioterror arrests
Date: 11/06/25 7:23 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 17
I suppose there's a good reason for importing roundworms

Yes. These specific worms (Caenorhabditis Elegans) are incredibly important in biological research - apparently they're the source of countless research projects. Here's a brief description from the University of Minnesota's Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is an entire research group in that university devoted to studying them:

cgc.umn.edu - What is c elegans

You understanding this factoid promotes the Up to No Good hypothesis, yes?

Yes - I fully believe they were Up to No Good. Importing prohibited animals on purpose - whether because you want to do research without complying with laws, or because you want to make money on black market pets - is Up to No Good. "Up to No Good" is not the same as "deliberately trying to cause bioterrorism." Clearly these guys were trying to source the specimens they wanted for their research without having to follow the rules. Which is No Good! Animal control rules are there for a reason, and it can be devastating if you don't follow them - whether you're importing C. Elegans for your research or a tanuki just to have as a pet!

But it's not bioterrorism - and you can bet your bippy that if there was even the merest hint of a whisper of a suggestion that these guys were importing these things for bioterrorism, and not just willfully breaking the rules so they could do their research, then they would have been charged with a terrorism count.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community