Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (26) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48506 
Subject: Re: Instagram and Meta knew
Date: 02/26/2024 5:18 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Meta knew that accounts of known pedos were having inappropriate chats with kids and they further knew that their models were promoting this stuff. They at any time could have applied any and all of the throttling techniques they have available to them to slow the spread. Or, demonetized it altogether. They made a conscious choice to profit off of shady parents exploiting their kids.

Do you think they should have the power to censor those parents, though? The arguments being made in support of the Texas law (and to a lesser extent the Florida law) are to the effect that the big social media companies are common carriers - that they should not be allowed to pick and choose their content. Should Meta or Instagram have the right to banish content just because they feel it's harmful, even though it's perfectly legal?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (26) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds