Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Texiera on what the d's should do
Date: 03/25/25 2:33 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 12
Sure it is. You said it wasn't, I said I don't know, and Ratcliffe is here saying that it's permissible to use when discussing government business.

No, I said it wasn't an authorized app to use for the transmittal of classified or national defense information. No version of it is. You can discuss unclassified, unrestricted "government business" on anything - even a pay phone. But you can't transmit this kind of information over

And right after that JR says they weren't sharing classified info. Confidential information mostly likely.

It's unfathomable that the information described in the Atlantic article would not be considered classified information. It may not have been labelled classified, but the participants should have known that it would be treated as such even if not labeled. And even if it weren't formally classified, it's indisputably national defense information, which also is prohibited from being sent that way. And Ratcliffe wouldn't necessarily know - and certainly doesn't get to make the call - whether information generated by another agency is considered classified by that agency.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community