Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |
Author: Steve203 ⎊❂🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 88915 
Subject: Re: Migrants don't receive due process
Date: 10/24/26 1:08 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
• Rasul v. Bush (2004): The Court ruled that federal courts have the statutory jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions from non-citizens held at Guantanamo Bay.
• Boumediene v. Bush (2008): The Court officially extended constitutional protections under the Suspension Clause to foreign detainees at Guantanamo, holding that the U.S. exercised de facto sovereignty over the base, rendering the administration's geographic exclusion unconstitutional.


Those cases would not have been heard, unless the Bush regime was denying due process to those prisoners. Gitmo is clearly US territory. You only need to look at what flag is flying over it. But I remember regime water carriers howling about the decisions. The net sifter does not reference a specific Bush EO or speech, but does offer this.

No single official in the George W. Bush administration formally declared that the U.S. Bill of Rights applies only to U.S. citizens.

Instead, this idea arose from controversial legal positions, memos, and policies championed by figures in the Bush administration—such as Vice President Dick Cheney and administration lawyers during the "War on Terror"—who argued for expansive executive powers regarding foreign nationals, military operations, and detainees outside standard civilian judicial protections.

Detainee and Surveillance Policies: The Bush administration infamously asserted wide-ranging authority to hold foreign terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, or conduct domestic military and surveillance operations outside traditional criminal court procedures.


Steve
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Steve203 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy