Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |
Author: lizgdal   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: Control Panel: Valuations. Temporary?
Date: 04/21/26 3:32 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
lizgdal wrote: There was a major accounting change around 1991, and so I double the Shiller CAPE values before 1991 when doing historical comparisons.

Wendy wrote: Please post a link to this information.


No links, just an observation after looking at the CAPE data. The data shows a break around 1992, and there were various FASB accounting changes around that time.

A thought experiment: were new investors better off in 1929 or 1999? CAPE says the 1999 bubble was far worse, but the returns after the bubbles burst were far worse in 1929. Was this just random luck, or does CAPE need an adjustment?

Total returns for the S&P 500 index equivalent, for the 10 years following peak CAPE dates:

CAGR  TR   GSD  MDD    From    CAPE      To     CAPE   ratioCAPE
-5 -37 45 -85 19290913 32.56 19390915 16.45 51%
-1 -5 21 -55 19991215 44.20 20091215 20.32 46%

ratio 1.36 1.24


CAPE was 36% higher in 1999 compared to 1929, and yet subsequent 10-year total return was -37% following 1929, and -5% following 1999. In both cases, CAPE values fell, but 10 years after the bubbles burst the 2009 CAPE was still 24% higher than the 1939 CAPE.

The 1930's stock market was much more volatile than the 2000's stock market. Maximum drawdown in the 1930's was 85%, while maximum drawdown in the 2000's was -55%. Both unpleasant, but the 1930's were clearly worse. Why doesn't the CAPE reflect this?

Recovery time was longer following the 1929 crash. Using Shiller's CAPE data, the time to recover after Real TR Price peaks:

         Real TR
Date Price
1929.09 12655
1945.10 12684
16.0 years recovery

2000.08 1207059
2013.05 1256426
13.0 years recovery


From a M* article:

Rank  %Decline   Peak   Trough  Recovery                          Event
1 79 Aug-29 May-32 Nov-36 1929 Crash & Great Depression
5 50 Feb-37 Mar-38 Feb-45 Great Depression & WWII

2 54 Aug-00 Feb-09 May-13 Lost Decade (Dot-Com Bust & Global Financial Crisis)

3 52 Dec-72 Sep-74 Jun-83 Inflation, Vietnam, & Watergate
4 51 Jun-11 Dec-20 Dec-24 WWI & Influenza
6 37 May-46 Feb-48 Oct-50 Postwar Bear Market
7 36 Nov-68 Jun-70 Nov-72 Inflationary Bear Market
8 34 Jan-06 Oct-07 Aug-08 Panic of 1907

link has a chart of Market Crash Timeline: Growth of $1
from morningstar.com - What weve learned years stock market crashes
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to lizgdal here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community