Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |
Author: OrmontUS   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: China bans Tesla-style door handles
Date: 12/29/25 7:16 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
autoblog.com - China is banning tesla style retractable door handles over safety concerns

Premium automakers, especially those deep in the EV space, have developed a notable affection for retractable door handles, famously found on all Tesla models. They look clean, reduce drag, and fit the futuristic image many electric cars aim for. But while the design wins style points, safety concerns have piled up. China has now drawn a line in the sand. From January 1, 2027, retractable EV door handles will no longer be allowed on new vehicles sold in the country. Regulators argue that electric-only mechanisms can trap occupants during collisions or power loss, turning something as basic as opening a door into a life-or-death challenge.

China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology recently released draft rules requiring all vehicles under 3.5 tons to have both interior and exterior handles with a mechanical emergency release. The idea behind it is straightforward. If a crash disables the battery or wiring, doors must still open manually. Many EVs already include mechanical releases inside the cabin, but owners often struggle to find them or difficult to operate under pressure – sometimes they don’t work at all. Cold-weather failures, delayed deployment, and pinched fingers have also fueled frustration. This conversation isn’t limited to China either. Earlier this month, a Rivian owner publicly called for more obvious emergency exit handles after struggling to locate them during a power failure.

OK - this makes sense to me, but I wonder how long it would take other countries to follow.

Jeff

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to OrmontUS here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community