Post #12623 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (164)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

It wasn't. That's the point. He's objecting to the idea of a border deal generally, not any specific term or provision.

Because he's well aware of the propensity for lawfare and poison pills. Plus why should he root for a bill that ties his hands as President?

They're not "gaming the system." As noted above between a third and forty percent of asylum applications are granted.

They're gaming the system. There's no mass upheaval in any country in Central or South America right now. Just a bunch of folks looking for an economic upgrade. That's the majority of our southern border crossings.

And they've been instructed to say the magic words to get the nice CBP officer to hand them a phone and a court date sometime in the next decade.

We're being played. Why can't you see that?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (164)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.