Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (44) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 88904 
Subject: Re: For old buds on this board, you there albaby?
Date: 11/04/26 7:20 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
What do you think, of the politics. Thanks.

I think a wealth tax is extremely unlikely, even if the Democrats won the Presidency in 2028.

People seem to forget this, but the legislation that a Democratic majority can pass is the legislation that can get through the party's most conservative Senators. That's why there wasn't a public option in Obamacare. It's why the Build Back Better Act was bedeviled by Manchin and Sinema. That's why we never had national cap and trade or a carbon tax. Etc. This sometimes gets overlooked, especially in the enthusiasm the progressive base has when their candidates win (like El-Sayed and Jackson and Sherrod Brown last night). But the road to 50 votes runs through the conservative side of the party.

Progressives had some big wins last night, but the margins of the Democratic control of the Senate lie with centrist Senators in reddish states: Kansas, Texas, South Carolina, North Carolina, Iowa. Those Senators are not especially likely to support a wealth tax.

Plus, there's a very good argument that Congress lacks the power to impose a wealth tax - or at least, the kind of wealth tax we're talking about here. Congress is not allowed to impose direct taxes without apportionment (that is, they have to be spread around to the states based on population). There is an exception for income taxes, which was adopted after SCOTUS ruled that Congress lacked the power to impose income taxes without apportionment. That will make it hard to get a wealth tax through Congress, much less have it stand up after adoption.

The Democrats have definitely moved more to the populist left and are likely to continue being more economically progressive going forward, so we can expect to see changes in tax policy to reflect that. I think that there will definitely be efforts to possibly tax unrealized cap gains, for example. But an actual wealth tax is probably well outside
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (44) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy