Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |
Author: Umm 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 21937 
Subject: Re: Some serious criticism of Todd Combs
Date: 09/24/24 4:33 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 16
"Todd has been called in to fix the issues that probably grew for a long time under beloved CEO Tony Nicely.

Warren for his part probably turned a blind eye to these issues.

The gap for example in IT investment between GEICO and Progressive is enormous. Where was the CEO or Board oversight that saw that free cash flow needed to be invested technological and analytical capabilities in the business rather than funneled up to Omaha?"


When Warren says that he is hands off when it comes to the subs and lets them run the business as they see fit (reputational matters notwithstanding), he genuinely means that. That is for better or for worse. On one hand, it attracts talented CEOs to the subs who enjoy the independence, on the other, occasionally a sub will flounder a little and will need to be cleaned up.

You cannot declare that the subs are given free rein to run their business and then have the board looking over their shoulders telling them how to run the business and invest in technology.

Yes, GEICO is far behind Progressive. That is not a death knell though. The business can be cleaned up and technology improved. That is what makes GEICO such a great business to invest in though. Even when it was falling behind and not investing, it was still putting up profits. Maybe not great profits, but not getting destroyed either.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Umm here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community