Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |
Author: Goofyhoofy ✸✹🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 88902 
Subject: Re: What would you do?
Date: 10/28/26 12:33 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 18
These will come to me one at a time, so sorry if I add a post or two later, but this one has bugged me for a long time:

Congress shall make no law which does not equally apply to itself and other branches, except as otherwise provided for in this document.

(Until 1995, Congress had exempted itself from minimum wage laws, OSHA safety requirement, civil rights laws, and a host of other requirements they put on others, but not themselves. That ended with the Accountability Act, but then that could be rescinded; having it permanently part of the Constitution would be a good idea.

(The “except as otherwise provided” is included to allow for the speech and debate clause, and the exemption from arrest while traveling to/from or at the House or Senate. )

* * * * * * * * * * *

(Oh, here’s another:

Votes for impeachment shall be secret, with only the totals and result announced, with detailed recording released for public examination after 10 years.

If there is a better way to handle this, I’m open to it. At the moment the political party “loyalty” brings impeachment to a meaningless exercise; I suspect if the vote was anonymous many Republicans (to use the current example) would vote to remove Trump, but they can’t because of the political implications for their career and state. To be clear, I’m not trying to make impeachment and conviction easier, I’m trying to make it more honest.


Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Goofyhoofy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy