Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (51) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Harris Wins
Date: 09/11/24 2:32 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 15
2027 will be the year. America will be at war in the Pacific and she’ll be the President. God save us all.

I'd rather have her as CiC in wartime than Trump.

Last night put on vivid display some of his worst traits as an executive. He's easily manipulated and has trouble controlling his emotional responses. He's so narcissistically self-confident (and averse to doing things he doesn't like doing) that he avoids preparation, even in circumstances where preparation is critical - so he ends up winging things on the fly, rather than doing the work to be ready for critical moments. And he latches onto conspiracies and false theories (Haitian immigrants are eating the cats, I really won in 2020) whenever it matches what he wants to be true.

That's why Harris was able to destroy him in the debate. His weaknesses are obvious and easily exploited. He's unwilling to put in the effort to defend against those exploits, and perhaps simply unable to do so. This was an obvious move by Harris - by all accounts, Trump's advisors all told him to expect that she would try to needle him and tried to give him the tools he would need to avoid getting caught up in it. Instead, he fell into every single trap she laid for him.

He's got one response to nearly everything - never admit that anything negative has happened, and counterattack as forcefully as possible. That's served him well in a lot of contexts. But in conflicts where he doesn't get to set the terms of the engagement, an opponent can easily arrange circumstances so that it's a crippling defect rather than a beneficial tactic.
.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (51) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community