Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |
Author: sykesix   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: The new hotness
Date: 01/15/26 6:13 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
The Big 3 have been late, late, late to the party so many times you wonder if they’re just completely asleep.

The reality is the car business isn't that great and hasn't been for a long time. Making cars is capital intensive and low margin. Those are two things that don't go well together in a business. Henry Ford II famously said "mini-cars mean mini-profits." Detroit has never really gotten away from that mindset despite Japan eating their lunch in the 1970s. The marginal cost of making a big car instead of a small car isn't that much, but you can sell it for a lot more. So big trucks are where it's at.

The math doesn't really math for big truck EVs though. Big trucks are heavier, have more rolling resistance, need more energy to accelerate/stop, need extra energy for payload/towing capacity, etc. So to keep the range reasonable, you need a proportionally much bigger battery than a smaller truck or sedan. But the batteries are the most expensive part. And the bigger batteries add weight, which means you need even bigger batteries, which adds more cost...

...which means no one wants your F-150 Lightning.

There are a few general problems with mass EV adoption too. As we've discussed, EVs aren't very practical if you can't charge where you normally park. They make more sense if you have a second ICE car for long trips. Some people have false fears of range anxiety (I kid! I kid! Sort of). Bottom line is there are a lot of people who aren't going to buy an EV. Not for a while anyway.

That said, I think Tesla is making a mistake by giving up on the car business. Of course, they haven't quite given up on it, but they are holding off to one side like stinky bag of diapers and acting more like the Big 3 than a young upstart. There are still a lot of niches to be filled. One is the smaller/mid-size two-seat pickup. That's wide open, you can't even buy an ICE version anymore. A true entry-level mass market coupe, mini-van, etc. Instead in the last few years we've only seen the cybertruck (see commentary on the F-150) and the seven seat Model Y. They haven't even refreshed long in the tooth models like the Model 3, which was never a thing of beauty to begin with.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to sykesix here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community