Not true.

Show your cite or it is true. Capiche?

Try this,

No, please explain the above with cites. Here's the case: a recent Supreme Court emergency order (in Vasquez Perdomo v. Noem) temporarily allowed agents to consider race/ethnicity, location, accent, and job type as factors, overturning a lower court block on these tactics, effectively permitting stops based on these profiles, at least for now.

threaten the clear basic citizenship rights granted in the Constitution,

---------------

It's only clear since the ambiguous language appears to lean in the direction you desire. Others see it just as clearly, but in the other direction.

Please explain what you think is ambiguous about the language and give cites. Here it is:

"Section 1 of the 14th Amendment states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

And please explain why we are pulling people out of their swearing in ceremonies and how it isn't racism and hate.