Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: wzambon 🐝 BRONZE
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84349 
Subject: Trump's Descent Into Dictatorial Folly
Date: 08/02/25 12:28 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 15
Trump’s firing of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics reminded Claire Berlinski of Joseph Stalin’s “war on statistical reality” in the 1930s.

If the data suggested unwelcome news—famines, plummeting grain yields, industrial failures—Stalin blamed the statisticians for “wrecking,” “sabotage,” or “bourgeois pessimism.” Valerian Osinsky, for example, head of the Central Statistical Directorate, was fired for reporting low crop yields that contradicted the projections in the Five-Year Plan.

And, indeed, there was also a rather strong whiff of banana republicanism (think Argentina) in Trump’s purge of statisticians who might deliver unwelcome news.

His impulsive move underlined how far he’s willing to go to bend the entire federal bureaucracy — and reality — to his will. So yesterday marked the last time that we will see a non-Trumpified report on jobs. And this is where the stupidity comes in.

Despite his Sun King pretensions and Uber Mensch bravado, Trump’s reckless firing of the BLS head reeked of panic. And from panic, folly flows like a river.

National Review’s Philip Klein notes that Trump’s “baseless charges will help undermine public confidence in yet another American institution, which will also create less certainty for investors.”

But it’s also hard to see how this helps Trump.

If Trump installs somebody at BLS who produces great numbers, anybody who isn’t already one of his supporters will dismiss them and assume that the appointee was producing the positive data to keep the boss happy.

And they would not be wrong, would they?


Charlie Sykes
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to wzambon here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community