No. of Recommendations: 10
Makes sense. Even when confronted with facts, they continue the lies. So they can't say "oh, I guess I was wrong". They should have said that when Springfield authorities (among others) said it was false. But they continued, without regard for any harm it may have caused. I know banning speech requires a high bar. But disregarding potential physical harm to others probably gets pretty close to it. As the article said, it shows intent. (Is that enough to show mens rea?)
Springfield has had to close its schools temporarily because of bomb threats, plus the multiple individuals receiving death threats.
