Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 21939 
Subject: Re: OT Fed/Macro/Rates
Date: 06/26/24 6:17 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 16
Is anyone aware of an example/case study of a country that did not expand their money supply at all during healthy economic times except to step in to stave off deflationary spirals during severe recessions? I'd love to read about it.

I think it's more about asymmetrical risk. Deflation is more dangerous than inflation. Perhaps better would be to look for examples that a country slipped into deflation and couldn't get out, and the economy had real problems. There are several such examples.

Fortunately, there are tools that will bring inflation down. Draining liquidity in a variety of ways, usually starting with higher interest rates, but perhaps also including changes to bank reserve requirements, QE, twist, tax changes, etc. Some of them are painful, but they do work.

However it is maddeningly difficult to get an economy out of deflation. This is very surprising...it would seem to be the easier problem--surely helicopter money would do it? But in the real world it seems not. Once the pervasive *mood* of deflation sets in, a country's economy can get really stuck in the muck.

Given the asymmetrical risk, it makes sense to target a positive number rather than zero or a slightly negative one. (a positive number has other benefits too, but this is just the deflation-avoidance reason).

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community