Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |
Author: WatchingTheHerd   😊 😞
Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: Lessons from the Harris / Trump Debate
Date: 09/11/24 4:39 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
I'm hoping there's some law somewhere at either the fed or state level that can be applied, but none of the articles mentioned anything.

--------------

This is why voters in all states need to pay close attention to shenanigans in any state. States are no longer labs of democracy, where new, inventive, efficient ways of serving the public are devised, implemented and tested in the hopes of sharing across the country. They are instead places where fringe groups work to perfect language for legislation or regulations that best obfuscates intent to allow enactment or adoption while drawing the least attention from opponents. Once that mix of obfuscation / impact is perfected, the results are spread to other states before most of the public figures out what is going on.

These current tactics being implemented in Georgia can be laid directly at the feet of Chief Justice Roberts, who crassly claimed America achieved a state of post-racial zen and no longer needed voting rights protections. It was a truly cynical bit of mental jujitsu. By claiming prior voting rights protections WORKED, he was presumably patting progressives patronizingly on the head (good job, your plan was needed forty years ago, it worked!) while claiming humans were now perfect and would never backslide so those pesky protections weren't needed.

It's the equivalent of examining guardrails along ten miles of highway, determining no vehicle has run into them in the last ten years, then concluding they should be removed.


WTH
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to WatchingTheHerd here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community