Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: The TACOrettes keep coming
Date: 05/19/26 9:43 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 11
One would have thought US leadership had been taught that lesson less than two weeks ago. Desperation in full display?

Yep. We're in a bit of a morass, with no great options to get out.

Resuming bombing might put some pressure on the Iranians, but they have responsive actions they can take. They can attack our military assets in the region, they can attack the Gulf States' energy resources, they can attack the undersea cables, they can attack the vessels trapped in the Gulf - all sorts of soft targets within missile and drone reach. Plus, we've already bombed most of the strategically valuable targets (one assumes the military ranked their targets capably), so there's only so much damage left to do by bombing. The more we bleed into the civilian side of the military-civilian spectrum, the more threatened the energy infrastructure of our Gulf allies (and world energy prices).

We always have the capacity to launch a ground invasion. But I think that's very unlikely, and Iran probably thinks so too.

We have the blockade, but that's not likely to work. Iran's regime endured the "maximum pressure" of sanctions that drove oil exports below 0.5 mbpd (and at times near zero) for close to two years in 2018-2019. They've learned how to reduce production while minimizing damage to wells, and to survive without oil import revenue for a very long while.

So we're left with threats of horrible consequences, which threats have been largely unsuccessful in shifting their negotiating strategy. They're not throwing any candy out, because they know it's essential to their long-term survival that the U.S. not get enough out of this to save face. But Trump can't withdraw without getting something from the Iranians that allows him to save face.

Hence, the stalemate continues. All we can do is posture: we threaten to kick their asses, have our friends hold us back from delivering the "tune up" we surely were prepared to do, and then wait a bit and do it again.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community