No. of Recommendations: 3
You didn't read what I said previously--there is no "evidence" "testimonial or otherwise."
An unsworn hearsay statement to the NY Times is not "evidence."
Testimony before Congress, under oath, is "evidence."
Authenticated documentation consisting of official government records is "evidence."
A senile old man's alibiing to the NY Times is not "evidence." Especially since a special prosecutor determined Biden's ability to recall is so defective that he should not be prosecuted, even though there was probably cause to have indicted Biden for crimes committed while he was Vice President regarding unlawful retention of government records and classified information.
