Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (38) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: trump getting bet again,
Date: 10/11/24 9:05 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
IF Joe had done the right thing a year ago and announced he would not seek reelection, and IF the Dem party had respected the competitive nomination process, do you believe Harris would have competed and won the nomination,

That's the most likely outcome. These things are never certain, of course, but nearly every Vice President that's sought their party's nomination for president has been successful in getting the nom. Nixon, Humphrey, Mondale, Bush, Gore, Biden. IIRC, the only VP that's sought the nomination that didn't get it was Quayle in 2000. The Vice Presidency may not be worth a bucket of warm piss as a job, but it's an incredibly strong position from which to run a campaign for the nomination - you have prominence, fundraising ability, access to every elected official in your party, and the ear of the President to serve as a carrot/cudgel for lining up support. In any nominating contest, the VP starts as the early leader, if s/he runs.

and if not, can you name one Dem who would have won the right to represent the party who wouldn't have beat trump, easy?

All of them. Every single one.

Harris' main problem isn't who she is. It's that voters are fairly unhappy with conditions in the country. Voters are livid about inflation and distraught about immigration and border policy. They blame Democrats for this. And Democratic voters are disappointed in how their "trifeca" control of the federal government (House, Senate, Presidency) during the first two years of the Biden Administration resulted in so few of their priorities getting enacted (hi, Joe Manchin!).

Most voters disliked the chaos and craziness of the Trump years, but they look back on a time of low inflation, low interest rates, low unemployment, steady (if not exceptional) GDP growth, and few foreign hot spots with positivity. The GOP has successfully raised the saliency of immigration and border control as an issue, and inflation was always a top voter concern. Every Democratic candidate would have run into the same major core issues that are giving Trump 46%+ of the vote.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (38) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community