Post #18291 by weatherman on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

for those that dont understand statistics, event gambling could theoretically be better predictor than polls with sufficient sample size and randomization. so its probably a few 10s of millions shy (of any value) of random eligible voters convinced to become participating bettors.
and the structure of sports/event betting is for the PLATFORM to make a profit, so odds are adjusted as needed.

there are other corrections needed as well...
e.g., no need to attend nor watch the game for sports betting, as it doesn't impact the outcome.
but voting requires some effort even if you already made an election bet.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.