Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: ges 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84353 
Subject: Re: The world's biggest whiners
Date: 03/23/25 9:38 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Mike Johnson
A new homework assignment.

Trump and Musk being mad about judges on social media means that a fresh new ticket is being printed for their short-order cook, House Speaker Mike Johnson. The absurd impeachment resolution against Boasberg is locked and loaded, as are articles against other judges who’ve impeded the administration’s ability to break the law. And yet, any of these resolutions may be too dead-brained and authoritarian to get out of the House—which tells you something—let alone to get two-thirds of senators to vote to convict. (Not to mention that taking up these measures would be an unneeded time suck for congressional Republicans, which is why plenty of Democrats might not mind seeing it happen.) Johnson, then, is considering other approaches to the subject that might satisfy the administration. He's considering, for example, allowing a vote on a bill from California Rep. Darrell Issa that would prevent district court judges from issuing nationwide injunctions. They could also vote on huffy resolutions declaring their distaste for Boasberg et al. It goes without saying that many Republican leaders and chairmen in Congress would prefer to be focusing on tax cut legislation now instead of fanatical, internally divisive efforts to break the federal judiciary. But the boss wants what the boss wants (the boss is Trump).
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to ges here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community