Post #42397 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

He's saying that is your position based on how you thought Hillary Clinton should be treated for receiving classified information. It is not albaby's position, it is his interpretation of your position.

He's trying to jiu-jitsu me, which is the same thing as making the argument himself (by attempting to pin me down with my own words). If you know anything about that particular martial art you'll recognize that reversals and takedowns are a big part of it.

I just used the same tactic on you (by asking you if you thought the reporter should already be in jail, because according to al's attempt to jiu-jitsu my earlier words, perhaps he should be)...and you pooped your pants in reply.

Pro tip: Stop making this stuff about other posters.

Go grab a pair of Depends and a couple of Handiwipes, and we can try again. Or you can get all stompy-foot in your next reply.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.