Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (51) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Fabulous news...
Date: 10/10/25 11:06 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
All wars are not bound to end sooner than later. The bulk of Gaza has been cleared. Hamas is in no position to mount an offensive response. They're on the ropes, so to speak.

Compare that to WW2 where despite nearly 5 yrs of intense combat, the fighting was so intense in the Pacific that it took atomic bombs, several months later, to convince the last of the Axis, Japan, to sign and 'sing.'


I think I'm now confused as to what you're trying to say. My point above was that stopping the fighting was a significant accomplishment, if indeed the current agreement ends up stopping the fighting. That this war still had years left in it. I thought you were saying that this war was already over, so it's not a big deal to stop it - but your point above about Japan is more in line with what I was saying than what I thought your point was. Japan basically lost WW2 at least a year and a half before they surrendered - if someone had been able to broker the end of the war in the Pacific in mid-1944, that would have been a massive and important accomplishment.

It doesn't matter that Hamas was in no position to mount an "offensive response." As long as they held hostages, Israel was going to keep fighting to try to get them back. As long as Israel kept fighting, Hamas would keep winning (in their eyes) in the court of global opinion. Both sides had all the incentive to keep fighting and fighting, for quite a long time.

If the current proposal ends up interrupting that, it will be a huge accomplishment - and Trump (and his team) will deserve credit for making it happen.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (51) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community